Robert Chaffe <rch### [at] compaqnet> wrote in message
news:37e70bb2@news.povray.org...
> Kevin Wampler <kev### [at] tapestrytucsonazus> wrote in message
> news:37E6FCDD.1178C254@tapestry.tucson.az.us...
> >
> > Perhaps even a more generalized fractal pattern, something that would
> allow you
> > to define with some flexibility the way in which the fractal was
> generated.  I
> > think that this could have the potential to be very powerful.  It might,
> > however, also be very difficult to learn how to use properly.
>
> Could be useful.  And "difficult to learn how to use properly" didn't stop
> media and radiosity from being included in the program.  8-)
>
> rc
>
>
>
How about "Fractint for povray" with the fractal engine from fractint
incorporated into pov.
Of course the fractinit team would have to agree?
Collaboration perhaps?

PB

Post a reply to this message